Introductory Unit
Different humans experience life and
its mysteries in a vast variety of manners due to biological and
sociological influences. Leonard Shlain wrote of the left versus
right brain, and how the analytical left brain of men, dominant in
Western cultures, distances humans from emotions, intuition, and
nature while promoting science, intellect, and action. Human
experience is shaped by which side of the brain is dominant, whether
one's intuitive right brain or rational left brain controls his or
her view of the world. Not only is human experience influenced by the
biological, but the sociological as well. In The Spell of the
Sensuous, David Abrams speaks of
the human experience as viewed through linear time and cyclical time.
In linear time, people are individuals, little dots that need to make
their mark in order to be remembered. Events are distinct, and are
never to be repeated. In cyclical time, events repeat themselves over
and over again, with only small details changing each time. There is
far less pressure to 'make your mark' and space and time are often
seen as inseparable, with no concept of 'time' and 'space' as
elements on their own. Another sociological influence on the human
experience is one's culture's creation myths. If, in the case of the
first chapter of Genesis, Man is created at the same time as Animal,
it sets up a preliminary equality and leads to a more positive and
cautious relationship with the natural world. However, when Man is
created before Animal, as in the second chapter of Genesis, it
provides humans with an excuse to claim superiority, to treat the
natural world as a possession, and say it was created for humans to
use. This view leads to a dissociation from nature, and with nature,
the animalistic and primal aspects of 'human nature.' A person with
this relationship will value traits of the left-brain and linear time
far more, as he is made to be above nature, should make his mark, and
needs the cold, rational ways of the left-brain to do so. A person
with a concept of being equal, or even inferior, to nature will value
right-brain and aspects of cyclical time more, as he or she tends
toward a more spiritual, emotional relationship with the world around
him or her.
Humans, Nature, and Sacred Space
As stated in the previous paragraph,
the relationship with nature profoundly influences the experience of
a human being. In a codependent relationship, as with the Australian
Aborigines, nature is to be respected, feared, and loved, and the
co-dependance forces an intimate relationship in which humans are
forced to care for the natural world about them, as it is an enormous
part of everyday life. When this co-dependance with non-domesticated
terrain is gone, as with most Western civilizations where food is
largely provided for by large-scale farms and slaughterhouses, the
natural world is far less important in the average day. This means
science and progress are worshiped rather than 'Dreamtime' and the
animals and landscapes of the natural world. Humans become
independent of nature, and so revel in themselves. This is further
exemplified in Shakespeare's The Tempest,
where Caliban, the island-born son familiar with the land has a far
different outlook from Prospero, the scholarly, former-Duke of Milan.
Caliban is used to the island providing for him, and requiring the
island to live. he respects the powers of the island, and is willing
to believe in a new god with just a few sips of wine. Prospero,
however, has had others worry about whee his food comes from, has
always had shelter, and had the free time and education to become a
scholar and scientist, and even magician, rather than being forced to
interact with nature directly. Prospero uses the island, Caliban, and
the sprite Ariel as tools and slaves, forcing the natural world to
bend to his will rather than be ruled by natural forces. In
Montaigne's essay Of Cannibals,
he discusses the difference between the Western cultures and the
native peoples they have encountered with expansion and exploration.
He challenges the ethnocentric Western belief of superiority, and
states that the natives are fascinating because they are closer to
nature and to the way God created them than any Western society. He
asks if the violence and seemed barbaric acts of the native peoples
are truly any worse than what Western armies and individuals have
done in the past. He mentions the oddities natives found in Western
society, such as choosing an inexperienced man as king, rather than
someone his elder who would have a better idea of politics and the
way in which the world works. Clearly the difference in the way in
which a human interacts with nature drastically affects his or her
life, and they way he or she interacts with all things.
Love and Beauty
In Plato's Symposium,
he states through a conversation between Socrates and Diotima: '"When
a man loves the beautiful, what does he desire?" "That the
beautiful may be his."' Love is an act of coveting, of wanting
to possess that which attracts a person's interest. Who, or what, a
person loves will deeply impact his or her experience, such as with
Dante who wrote about the unattainable Beatrice for his entire life,
or Tristan and Isolde whose tragic courtly romance lasts through
marriage and separation, right up to Tristan's death. Beauty and love
inspire humans to go beyond the ordinary to achieve what they would
not have done otherwise, or to commit acts they never would have
considered before they fell victim to their passions. A man can be
driven to murder in a jealous rage, or he can be convinced to change
his ways and become better for his love. He might write beautiful
sonnets, as did Shakespeare, or write a play based on the betrayal of
a loved one. The way in which one seeks out love also has a drastic
impact on one's life. The experience of love, or lust, is extremely
different between a one night stand and a long-term monogamous
relationship. A person who goes through countless relationships has a
more shallow connection with others when compared to someone who
takes time to form a lasting bond with the people around him or her.
In the Art of Courtly Love,
Andreas Capellanus goes so far as to say that men who spend time with
too many women are undeserving of love. Others are also more unlikely
to wish to form friendships and relationships with those with a
fickle disposition. Depending on how one treats love, and in turn the
others affected by his or her love, he or she will be treated
differently by the people around them. In The Shape of
Things, Adam first loves Evelyn,
but his friends dislike her because they can see the way he is being
used and changed to her liking. When he discovers that, for Evelyn,
he was a graduate thesis project, his love turns to hatred and the
scorn others felt for her is now his as well. Love drives people to
extreme emotions and acts done in a passionate frenzy that is not
entirely under rational control, and yet can shape the course of a
life.
Law and Ethics
All civilizations are guided by
certain rules, taboos, and morals which create distinct differences
in the human experience. In Western civilizations, the Old Testament
is the dominant force, and we follow the Ten Commandments and
Holiness Code, not necessarily because of religion, but because it is
what we are taught is right. 'Thou shalt not kill,' and 'thou shalt
not steal' are found in nearly every culture, but others, such as
Sunday being a day of rest, are distinctly Western. Where one culture
says a thirty year old man marrying a fourteen year old girl is
perfectly acceptable, even the norm, another says it is repulsive and
wrong. The morals we are taught and the laws we follow create a
distinct human experience for every individual. In Crimes and
Misdemeanors Judah feels little regret for the death of Delores,
where another person might be so driven with guilt that he or she
could not live with themselves. In the same movie, there is a
conversation at a family dinner about the existence of God and how
that affects morality. Aunt May insists that there is no God and no
morality, that we do only what we feel, while others at the table
take stances ranging from the extremely religious to the moderate, to
agreeing with May. Aquinas would disagree, saying that goodness
promotes God and his will, while evil does not and is based in lust
and a self-serving attitude. The way situations appear to each of
these people would seem extremely different, and the decision each of
them would make, and consider to be 'good,' could be extremely
different because of these views. Where Aunt May might not feel an
obligation to help a stranger, the Holiness Code states that helping
those less fortunate is a requirement for moral behavior. John Stuart
Mill would act in the way that would best help the largest number of
people, Aquinas would do as God bids, and Nietzsche would do what his
emotions tell him is most pleasurable. These acts might all be
different, but none of the men would feel guilt over his actions, yet
might condemn the actions of another man. Since we, generally, act
based on what we feel is right or wrong, ethics shape our reactions,
our decisions, and our actions.
The Inner Journey and the Meaning of
Human Existence
Life is often called a journey, and
the transitions between birth and death are numerous and rely heavily
on one's inner self. In The Hero's Journey,
Joseph Campbell speaks of life as an adventure, one complete with a
monster, abyss, and return. He says that all people undergo some
adventure where they must fight their personal demons, be it
physical, mental, or otherwise, and must alone travel into a place of
confusion and darkness within which they will discover something
about themselves and come out of it a better person. Finally, there
is the triumphant return of the hero who brings back some
contribution to society. What this means for the human experience is
that a person ought to find his or her personal adventure, confront
their problem and return with some benefit to others. It gives human
existence meaning in bettering oneself as well as helping others.
Hamlet has a similar take on this meaning, giving the message that
one should contemplate life intellectually, as Hamlet does, but not
to the extent that the physical world has no meaning. Hamlet's
contemplations are interrupted by the murder of his father, and
revenge on Claudius takes over. Even as Hamlet ponders philosophy and
the meaning of human life when all people turn to dust and food for
worms, he grows to accept his fate and is at peace when he is killed
after avenging his father. He has bettered himself as well as found
justice for the murdered King. Each person ought to complete an inner
journey that ends in progress in their intellect, as well as progress
in their actions to improve the world around him or her.
The human experience is shaped by many aspects of one’s life. It may be because (according to the left brain/ right brain quizzes) both sides of my brain are equally dominant, but I personally do not think my human experience is influenced by the biology of my brain more than other biological factors that shape my life. I do agree that one’s relationship to nature has great influence over his experience of the world. It seems to me, in Western cultures, most people do not even see food as “provided for by large-scale farms and slaughterhouses.” I would say farms have more of a connection to nature than many westerners, for whom food merely comes from a grocery store. I find it interesting that a Westerner such Montaigne would claim that anyone could be close to the way God created them than other individuals, for is the idea that God has created everyone? And therefore, wouldn’t everyone only be as far from the way God created him as he could get in a single lifetime?
ReplyDeleteWhen speaking of the possibility of someone being undeserving of love, I do not think it is for any individual to decide who deserves what. However, when it comes to “men who spend time with too many women,” as Capellanus speaks of, I think maybe it is more that they cannot find real love. For whether or not they deserve to find it, I believe it would be difficult to find love while moving prom partner to partner. In The Shape of Things, Adam’s “love turns to hatred.” While the concept of love turning to hatred is sad, I think it is very true to life. For I do believe that in order to really hate something, or someone, you must have loved first. I think that this love/hate relationship can be the “adventure where [one] must fight [his] personal demons.” Everyone’s demons are very personal, and can range from a relationship with nature, to passionate love turned to hate.
One part of this post that really caught my attention were the last two sentences of your first paragraph. You were able to synthesize the views of the entire unit and organize them into two clear subunits under the headings of the right and left brain. While, this statement is not something we read or talked about in class, you made your case for this opinion by using strong background information. Another synthesis of texts that drew me in was in your paragraph about law and ethics. While explaining the roles of the characters in Woody Allen's "Crimes and Misdemeanors", you infused the views of Aquinas and the morals stated in the Holiness Code. This created a depth to your summaries and, I think, captured the nature of this course. No one piece of information was meant to be taken in on its own, but in relationship to all aspects of the unit; in a cyclical manner as Abram would say.
ReplyDeleteI found it very interesting how you said that the human experience is determined by which side of the brain is dominant. In a way I believe that it's true. Being a left-brained person myself my choices regarding my future profession, as well as miniscule things like how I organize my closet are all influenced by the fact that I am left brained. A right brained person has a stronger likelyhood of pursuing a career in the arts, whereas a left-brained individual is more likely to get in to the sciences. I don't agree that if one is left brained than they are more likely to go along with the second chapter of genesis belief that humans are superior to animals and therefore are dissociated from their animalistic side. It is a very broad generalization, because left brained individuals are scientific, and therefore have the ability to acknowledge our animalistic roots. From a biological perspective, humans have evolved from primates, and while we have higher cognitive processes, at our core we have many animalistic traits.
Delete