The
evolution of the left brain was a revolutionary change that changed the
human experience more than any other event in human history. As we
read in Shlain, the left brain allows us to use logic and rational
thought. The left brain makes rational logical thought a reality. It is
the source of our ability to suspend emotion in favor of logic, a trait
unique to humans, as well as the organ that allows us to communicate
effectively in complex forms of language. Spoken language requires the
cooperation of both sides of the brain in order to function to its
fullest capacity, as we learned in Abrahms’ The Spell of the Sensuous.
The left brain interprets the mouth movements in conjunction with the
sounds which reach the ear, while the right brain simultaneously
translates much more subtle signals that are revealed in the other
person’(s) tone, expression, and body language. With the valuable
information supplied by the right brain, we can more accurately gauge
the reaction to our words and adjust accordingly. This is an intrinsic
part of entertaining storytelling. As such, stories lose much of their
meaning when they are read or heard without being seen. When stories are
read, only the left brain is engaged. There are no non-verbal signals
to interpret, only the mechanical nature of written language, depriving
us of more immersive experience. If we are able to hear the story read
aloud, as we did with the excerpt from David Sedaris’ work, we may
understand the meaning better through the reader’s tone and inflection.
However, neither of these can match the immersive, engaging experience
of observing an animated storyteller while he or she relates some tale.
Whether
we admit it or not, all humans are intrinsically linked to nature. At
some point in every culture’s history, its people express a deep
connection to the natural world. In more “primitive” cultures, such as
that of Native Americans, individuals are encouraged to respect nature
from birth through their creation myth. In most Native American tribes,
the creation myth very often features animals that wield god-like
powers, and these animals are often portrayed as the creators of human
life. In other stories, the animals enable the humans to survive, such
as the story of the heavenly women who fell to Earth. One of the birds
brought sediment from the ocean bottom to form land on the back of a
giant turtle’s shell to save the women from drowning. However, in many
of the “more civilized” cultures of the world, the creation myth
suggests, whether explicitly or through implication, that humans are
superior to animals. A good example of this is found in some
interpretations of Genesis. In this creation story, it states that God
created man before all the animals, and gave him dominion over all of
nature.
As
a result of these opposing viewpoints, significant differences between
the behavior of the cultures are evident. Native Americans show great
reverence and respect for every part of the natural world, from the
smallest organism to the largest. They base their entire lives around
living in harmony with nature. In contrast, many western civilizations
show little to no regard for Mother Nature. Environments are destroyed
with impunity, and animals are hunted to extinction without a hint of
scruple.
A
culture’s creation beliefs also affect the definition of a sacred
space. For example, the Australian Aborigines believe that all land
untainted by industry is sacred because during the Dreamtime, their gods
walked throughout the land, forming the topography and seeding life.
Every topographical feature is the direct result of manipulation by
gods, which makes all the earth sacred. In western culture, sacred
spaces are most often artificial structures, constructed by mortal hands
and often completely unrelated to any direct act by their deity.
Practitioners must travel to that one arbitrary location in order to
worship fully, which limits the appeal of that sacred space.
Sacred spaces do not necessarily have to have any religious significance. In Grizzly Man,
Timothy Treadwell flees the civilized world in search of serenity and
solitude. He discovers “his” island, as well as the bears that inhabit
it. He instantly recognizes this sanctuary to be a sacred place, free
from the harmful influences of man and his machines. His time with the
bears gives Timothy a level of clarity that allows him to think about
his existence. He realizes that he must protect this sacred space from
any who would seek to defile it, and dedicates the remainder of his life
to this goal.
The ability to understand the abstract idea of beauty is another trait
found in no other species other than humans. No two individuals or
cultures share the exact same definition of beauty. In older cultures,
beauty often meant simply whatever features were most useful. For
example, Nigel Speevey explains that while the Woman of Willendorf
appears to be an incredibly crude interpretation of a woman, each
feature was designed for a specific purpose. Desirable traits, such as
large hips and large breasts, were emphasized due to the great
importance of child-bearing in that era and culture. Her genitalia was
also exaggerated to suggest fertility. However, other features, such as
arms, lower legs, and facial features were minimized because they had no
bearing on a woman’s primary use: reproduction.
Throughout history, philosophers have expressed a plethora of
opinions on beauty itself, as well as its relationship to love. Plato
believed that love was nothing more than the desire to possess something
beautiful. Even the love a parent has for his or her child is the
desire to possess something beautiful: a kind of immortality through the
continuation of one’s bloodline. In the every love poem that we read,
such as Song of Songs, there are no more than a few lines without
mention of beauty. It is the catalyst for all real love, and holds a
great fascination and preoccupation for humans.
Unfortunately, many individuals use their beauty for darker purposes, as seen in The Picture of Dorian Gray, written
by Oscar Wilde. Dorian uses his surpassing to beauty and charm to live a
life inundated with carnal pleasure. Whenever a problem arose, others
would forgive him for no other reason other than his unchanging beauty.
Dorian even managed to talk his way out of murder, using his looks to
his advantage and overwhelming lesser persons. However, despite the ease
in which he could bed anyone he chose, Dorian never truly found love,
and was driven mad by guilt over his crimes. He does not have the
courage to confess his crimes, and when he stabs his portrait in a fit
of rage, he inadvertently kills himself.
In contrast to Dorian, Meursault, the protagonist of Albert Camus’ L’étranger,
makes no attempt to weasel his way out of iron grip of the law. He
does not deny his crimes, and instead of struggling fruitlessly, he uses
the many days of his incarceration to reflect on his past, as well as
life in general. When his time comes, he is far better prepared to die
than Dorian. Meursault accepts his sentence with composure and resigns
himself to fate, knowing that the laws which had convicted him were just
and fair.
Although he would have denied this vehemently, his convictions about
murder were in agreement with the Ten Commandments. The Ten Commandments
were given to Moses to give the Israelites a foundation upon which to
base their legal and ethical codes. These values were continued by
Christians, and by extension, the laws of our great nation. The
commandments are clear, concise, and apply to just about every situation
and time period, a fact which led to their adoption into our laws. Even
though some commandments were not signed into law, they did become the
basis of the ethical code that most people follow currently.
Interestingly, there are a great many similarities between the
eight-fold path of Buddhism and the commandments. For example, both
forbid murder, adultery, and greed. These points are simply written in a
different manner in the eight-fold path.
Humans have and always will struggle to understand why certain things
happen to them. Every culture created its own stories to help explain
these phenomena. These stories often feature unwilling heroes
reluctantly embark upon an adventure that changes them into a
completely different person. Interestingly, Joseph Campbell discovered
that these stories are ubiquitous across nearly every culture. In
addition, each of those myriad stories follows the same general path,
which he dubbed “The Hero’s Journey,” or monomyth. The hero starts in
the real world, but is called or sent to somewhere unfamiliar to them.
They face challenges, and eventually fall to the lowest level (the
Abyss), which may be a mental or physical condition. There they
experience a sort of death and rebirth. Eventually, they emerge and are
transformed into a different being and return home.
Every human being undergoes this journey, although they are rarely so
exciting. Instead, they happen subtly, making small changes within our
psyches that eventually manifest themselves and cause visible change in
behavior and outlook. Without this journey, we would be doomed to make
mistakes without the hope of learning a lesson from them.
Nice Caleb, this is awesome thought exploration on the five units we studied in class! I whole heartedly enjoy and agree with your second paragraph, that every human is linked to nature. Like you said, Native American cultures include the praising and respect toward nature and the surrounding environment, giving them the concept of creation myth and maybe a start on where they come from. Even big shot city-dwellers are linked to nature, and they would not be able to survive without its nourishment and shelter! I also like your second to last paragraph, when you talk about unpredicted events that happen in one's life. One will encounter many events in his life that seem to have no reason, but it is up to him to decide how to deal with them so that he can succeed at his goals in life.
ReplyDeleteCaleb:
ReplyDeleteWell done. A fascinating portion of this passage was your description of beauty. It's interesting that you dilute beauty solely down to Plato's idea. I like to think that beauty could have a more metaphysical existence, but the idea that beauty is based primarily off of biological urges makes sense, too. The only portion I disagree with is your stance on the left side of the brain. You allude to its evolution as a organ and how it's the most valuable part of the human body; but, I would disagree, saying that the left brain is just a tool for survival. One needs the right side of the brain in order to make the human experience unique. Solid post.
Humans are very narcissistic. We often believe that humans are superior to nature and that everything put on this Earth was meant to be used to only our advantage. Although naive in the sense that nature is a part of our existence, some humans are also naive to the fact that nature itself can be dangerous. Timothy Treadwell had the best intentions, but there are things that humans can do to help nature that will not put us in harms way. There needs to be a happy medium between conscientiously aware of nature and "humans are superior". We as humans need to be one with nature, respect and admire its beauty. With that recognizance of beauty there needs to come a relationship of love and compassion. Plato may say that love is nothing more than the desire to posses something beautiful, but I firmly believe that love means compassion and something that needs to be delicately handled and cared for. That is how humans need to approach nature.
ReplyDelete